Since 2012, I’ve had the pleasure of attending all sorts of conferences, from small BarCamp-style un-conferences run by local volunteers, to large, professional events with thousands of attendees in the heart of London. I can say categorically that Business of Software Europe was the best by far.
Location
This year the conference was held at Churchill College, Cambridge, and it would be hard to think of a more perfect setting. Cambridge has been a university town since the 13th century, and weaves a mesmerising tapestry of history & tradition on the one hand, with cutting-edge technology on the other. The college itself was an excellent venue, with great conference facilities surrounded by beautiful green lawns, where guests who didn’t mind the chill wind enjoyed a few games of croquet Thursday evening.
Programme
The conference programme was incredibly well thought out, with plenty of time to mingle, and a dazzling array of speakers. I’ve written about my favourite talks elsewhere, so I won’t repeat myself here. The ‘hallway track’ was the best I’ve ever experienced. It kicked off with welcome drinks & light snacks the evening before the conference proper. I wasn’t expecting much, but this turned out to be great. Not only did I get a chance to network with other attendees, I also spoke to a few of the speakers, who were all incredibly friendly and approachable. From a logistics point of view, getting people signed in & badged up the night before made for an extremely smooth start on Thursday morning.
Finally, not only did BoS lay on catered meals for everyone, they also designated tables for specific topics of conversation so ‘birds of a feather’ could flock together. This was a stroke of genius, as everyone stayed together and continued to build connections, rather than peeling off in small groups to go foraging.
Attendees
Although smaller than many others (~200), the conference was very well attended by a great mix of people spanning the whole tech ecosystem, from venture capital to app developers and from freelancers to product managers to CEOs. The companies represented ranged from biotech to fashion.
Atmosphere
I’ve saved the best for last: the atmosphere at BoS was truly unique. Some conferences I’ve attended in the past have been aggressively sales-driven, and downright competitive, with people elbowing each other out of the way so they can get to speakers etc. BoS was the polar opposite. Beyond mere friendliness, BoS managed to foster a truly collaborative atmosphere where we all worked together to make the conference as great as possible for each other. Sure, business happened, but that was not the point. There seemed to be an implicit understanding that people do business with people, and that by helping others we all win.
For example, I had just met Simon from Metail, and we were talking shop when, having learnt that I take pride in my WordPress work, he practically frog-marched me to meet Chris from Mind the Product, who had been looking for a good WP developer. There was nothing in it for Simon, he just saw an opportunity to help, and took it. This is not unusual. I hear many others recount similar experiences.
So, overall, Business of Software Europe 2019 was the best conference I’ve ever had the pleasure of attending, and I can’t wait to go again next year. Whether you’re new to conferences or an old hand, do yourself a favour and check out Business of Software. You’ll be blown away!
I’m incredibly grateful to Mark Stephens at IDR Solutions for recommending it and to Mark Littlewood at Business of Software for inviting me!
Defi stable assets. Decentralized Finance, or DeFi, has been gaining popularity in recent years as a way to provide financial services without the need for traditional intermediaries like banks. One of the key components of DeFi is stable assets, which are cryptocurrencies designed to maintain a stable value relative to a specific asset or basket of assets. Stable assets are essential in the world of DeFi mysticfinance.org because they provide a reliable store of value and medium of exchange for users to transact on blockchain platforms. Without stable assets, users would be exposed to the high volatility of traditional cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum, making it difficult to predict the value of their holdings. There are several different types of stable assets in the DeFi space, each with its own unique characteristics and use cases. The most common type of stable asset is a fiat-backed stablecoin, which is pegged to a specific fiat currency like the US dollar or the Euro. These stablecoins are typically issued by a centralized entity that holds reserves of the fiat currency in a bank account to back the value of the stablecoin. Another type of stable asset is a crypto-backed stablecoin, which is collateralized by other cryptocurrencies like Ethereum or Bitcoin. These stablecoins are often issued on decentralized platforms like MakerDAO, where users can lock up their crypto assets as collateral to mint stablecoins. The value of the stablecoin is maintained by over-collateralizing the loan to ensure that the value of the collateral is always higher than the value of the stablecoin. Algorithmic stablecoins are a newer type of stable asset that uses algorithms to automatically adjust the supply of the stablecoin in response to changes in demand. These stablecoins are designed to be fully decentralized and autonomous, with no need for a centralized entity to control the supply. Examples of algorithmic stablecoins include Terra’s UST and FRAX. Stable assets play a crucial role in the DeFi ecosystem by providing a stable unit of account for users to denominate their assets and transactions. They also serve as a bridge between the traditional financial system and the world of cryptocurrencies, allowing users to easily move value between different platforms without being exposed to the volatility of the market. In addition to their use as a medium of exchange, stable assets can also be used as a store of value and a unit of account for decentralized applications like lending, borrowing, and trading. Users can earn interest on their stable assets by providing liquidity to DeFi platforms or by lending them out to other users. Despite their many benefits, stable assets are not without risks. One of the main risks associated with stable assets is the potential for the stablecoin to lose its peg to the underlying asset, leading to a loss of value for users. This can happen if the centralized entity backing the stablecoin fails to maintain adequate reserves or if there is a black swan event that causes a sudden drop in demand for the stablecoin. To mitigate these risks, users should carefully research the stable asset they are considering using and ensure that it is issued by a reputable and transparent entity. Users should also diversify their holdings across different types of stable assets to reduce their exposure to any single stablecoin. In conclusion, stable assets are an essential component of the DeFi ecosystem that provide users with a stable unit of account and medium of exchange for transacting on blockchain platforms. By understanding the different types of stable assets available and the risks associated with them, users can make informed decisions about how to incorporate stable assets into their DeFi strategies.